300 Win Mag Ballistics Chart
300 Win Mag Ballistics Chart - The.300 rum is more powerful. I never considered trimming the meplats on the rounds to shorten them up to fit in the mag. I backed them in so they just fit into the magazine and while i did lose a about.25moa. Please post if you have. Ammo is less expensive at the store. I see in articles that the.300 win. I was using 175 smk's.
Is considered a favorite cartridge for sniping purposes, the favorite being the.308 win. Doesn't have a lot in the way match bullets made for it, and there isn't much of match ammo loaded for it from factory. Yea, many poopoo the.300 win mag due to that short neck. My.340 weatherby magnum will shoot a 1/3 group and that's a.
The.300 rum is more powerful. Mag., has more fps, and more foot pounds of energy, why wouldn't it be considered a better cartridge, over the.300 win. I don't think the accuracy is much different, but it would take a better marksman than me to answer that. The.223 is a light load, good for about 700 yards or less. I never considered trimming the meplats on the rounds to shorten them up to fit in the mag. I got my factory 700p sub.5moa all day long the problem was that i had to single load the rounds which got old in a big hurry.
Mag., has more fps, and more foot pounds of energy, why wouldn't it be considered a better cartridge, over the.300 win. The.308 is a great long range cartridge, but loses ground to the.243 win and.260 rem. 300 win mag ballistics chart jump to latest 116k views 10 replies 7 participants last post by rob01 jun 25, 2006 The.223 is a light load, good for about 700 yards or less. I got my factory 700p sub.5moa all day long the problem was that i had to single load the rounds which got old in a big hurry.
I never considered trimming the meplats on the rounds to shorten them up to fit in the mag. No velocity was lost from 26 inches to 22 inches. I backed them in so they just fit into the magazine and while i did lose a about.25moa. Yea, many poopoo the.300 win mag due to that short neck.
I Have No Intension Of Doing All That You Have And Will Be Loading To Factory Coal With 76 Gr Of H1000 Looking For 2,850 Fps.
Please post if you have. I was using 175 smk's. Yea, many poopoo the.300 win mag due to that short neck. I backed them in so they just fit into the magazine and while i did lose a about.25moa.
I Never Considered Trimming The Meplats On The Rounds To Shorten Them Up To Fit In The Mag.
I see in articles that the.300 win. The limiting factor with both rounds,.300 win mag and.300 rum is recoil. But it has been used in many long range competitions and won many. Is considered a favorite cartridge for sniping purposes, the favorite being the.308 win.
The.308 Is A Great Long Range Cartridge, But Loses Ground To The.243 Win And.260 Rem.
Doesn't have a lot in the way match bullets made for it, and there isn't much of match ammo loaded for it from factory. Mag., has more fps, and more foot pounds of energy, why wouldn't it be considered a better cartridge, over the.300 win. My.340 weatherby magnum will shoot a 1/3 group and that's a. The.300 rum is more powerful.
No Velocity Was Lost From 26 Inches To 22 Inches.
300 win mag ballistics chart jump to latest 116k views 10 replies 7 participants last post by rob01 jun 25, 2006 I have shot both and both in a good rifle are more then capable of.5 moa accuracy. I got my factory 700p sub.5moa all day long the problem was that i had to single load the rounds which got old in a big hurry. The.223 is a light load, good for about 700 yards or less.
The.223 is a light load, good for about 700 yards or less. No velocity was lost from 26 inches to 22 inches. I have no intension of doing all that you have and will be loading to factory coal with 76 gr of h1000 looking for 2,850 fps. I'll throw the.300 wsm in for good measure. Mag., has more fps, and more foot pounds of energy, why wouldn't it be considered a better cartridge, over the.300 win.